Talk:Remedios Custodio/@comment-76.172.105.236-20180714060408/@comment-36131591-20180715092457

the problem is that both she and ainz are evil from a neutral point of view.

I agree that ainz was cold and evil, but this time he is justified with killing the boy, even by the citizens of RHK, and even by the boy own father. Sure, they do not know that he is behind the invasion, but this is from their point of view.

This retard, since I just cannot call her by other name, keep getting indecision and outright refuse to admit that it was her stupidity and order to fall back that is the main cause of the boy's death. She keep justify herself by saying or thinking that she is not directly respondsible, and ignore that she is still respondsible.

Later, she accuse ainz of working with jal not because she figure it out, but because she was angry that he made her look bad, so obviously people will not believe her.

Thus in this case it is evil vs evil, stupid and ignorance vs cynicism.