Talk:Zesshi Zetsumei/@comment-184.13.135.126-20180814032820/@comment-45.56.46.26-20180815210720

We've repeatedly SEEN situations where Ainz got his hackles up over the possibility of a Player being involved, found out there was no Player, and gave up on his various deliberations on the subject of what to do to them.

Admittedly, a lot of the reason that the Theocracy has gotten off so lightly thus far is because Ainz is cautious of the likelyhood of a Player pulling their strings from behind the scenes. When he gets around to subjugating them, he's going to have them in a vise so tight that not even the 6GG and 8GK combined could save them.

And then, once he verifies that there is no Player after all, he's going to calm down and act rationally, as he's done in every case thus far no matter HOW angry he was. True, Ainz acting rationally does not always do the kinds of things that some posters who obviously have zero regard for the virtue of rationality think would be 'rational'.

But your lack of ability to comprehend the meaning of the term "rational" does not make you a great arbiter of rationality.