Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-33094605-20171013062410/@comment-46.55.216.27-20171015183736

Retardios has said that she intends to "use" Ainz as much as he can and even that the best case scenario would be if Jaldabaoth and Ainz lead to each others respective deaths in the duel to come. Therefore it should be said that she was never "on his side" to begin with. She has not shown any overt respect to him, but has made attempts to not insult him, which were, well successful only incially. She, as a paladin who is so dull that can clearly encompass and build herself upon the beleif of true "Justice", can never accept an undead beings continued existance under any circumstances. So Ainz is an enemy to her, her paladins, and her Holy Kingdom, though one set out for removal on a later date. She will not due anything to undermine him until his fight with Jaldabaoth is over, because upon his victory lies the future of her kingdom and her people, such an action would be against her morals, because it would lead to unnecessary death. And do remember she opposes any death, which she thinks she can avoid, whether that is posible in reality or not.

I think you are trying to hint at the posibility for her to lead to Ainz's demise, which is honestly impossible, for she cannot hurt him. No one in the HK(Holy kingdom) can. And therefore it is in my beleif that his death is going to be simply staged, and not even a posibility in this scenario, unless a drastic change is set in motion.