Talk:Zesshi Zetsumei/@comment-67.82.209.206-20191207164408/@comment-153.2.246.38-20200110123157

@Mad-Dan90

In continuation of my previous comment ^

I just thought I'd clarify before someone said anything.

A "threat" implies danger or destruction. In the context of the OG comment, nothing can be a threat to Nazarick. However, if you want to broaden the definition of "threat" like how you clarified in your second comment, then literally anything and everything can be a "threat" to Nazarick.

If we're going to use your broadened definition, for example:  Remember when....

- the Empire's Workers invaded Nazarick? Technically, they were a "threat" to Nazarick.

- the Lizardmen attacked the forces of Nazarick? Technically, they were a "threat" to Nazarick.

- the Kingdom rallied their army to fight Ainz and the Empire? Technically, they were a "threat" to Nazarick.

You see where I'm going with this? All of them could 'damage' Nazarick in some way, hence according to your definition they must be threats, even if they could never win against Nazarick.

Doesn't make much sense, huh. That's why I think you took the OG's comment way out of context. As I said before, nothing in the NW is a true threat to ''Nazarick. ''There are quite a few things that could be a threat to individuals of Nazarick, however. There should be a clear distinction.