Talk:Albedo/@comment-128.130.252.95-20150911201614/@comment-178.165.129.246-20150918234049

@LordLongAssReplies: I guess there's no point arguing with an idiot.

choosing a character trait with no rational explation as to how it's related to what's written in the setting... I wonder how you function on day to day basis...

Before, I advised you to read about what forms a personality, you refused and now you keep insisting on proving how much of an imbecile you are. When the time comes and you suddenly stop being high on the smell of your own farts, please find the time to read about some theories of the 16 personality types (There are other aproaches that rely on other factors, but I can swear you won't understand them even if you read them, so start with that theory if some brain cells still remain inside the empty being you see in the mirror).

My simple questions were a simplified version of real personality tests. I guess they were too simplified for a simpleton. Their true purpose was not to be answered because I am the one who reposted the setting, so I know there's nothing in it that hints one way or the other. Their objective was first to educate you on how the text was purposely missing what's useful for deriving a simple personality type and secondly to show that focusing on useless trivia was the intention of the author ironically revealing more about the one writing the setting than the one the setting is all about.

You miss my point... you miss what the author's intention is... and yet you're so blinded by your ego that you can manage to write long shit replies without saying anything useful... In a sense, you're gifted... Your sincere ignorance may indeed have redifined how psychology looks at the human mind... Your conscientous stupidity answered my questions about how a fictional character's incomplete personality raises no questions and poses no threat to an incomplete and an illogical mind.