Talk:Ainz Ooal Gown/@comment-35382997-20181009050949/@comment-35382997-20181009111629

The last part would probably be my guess and the biggest problem.

The amount of selective logic and reasoning is honestly ridiculous. Like someone asked about how Ainz could possibly know about the idea of fair wage, thinking it was a plot hole. Since it is impossible to be an anime-only and know about the world of 2138, the person either had their own bullshit bias or was too busy reading the wiki to read the actual material.

Not to mention all the cases of people saying Ainz's character has changed so that he could commit more and more evil acts even though it's been established from the beginning that Ainz is a sociopath who feels nothing from killing people. Or the fact that people say that Ainz is evil when he clearly doesn't particularly want to commit evil acts or relish in them. Half the time Ainz doesn't even perceive what he's doing as evil. The dumbest part is that all one has to do is compare Ainz to Demiurge to understand whether or not Ainz is evil. I strongly believe that Ainz is chaotic neutral because it doesn't make sense for him to otherwise be averted to pointless killing and painful deaths for those that did nothing wrong. To put chaotic neutral in Yggdrasil terms, then Ainz should be around the karma value of Entoma. If Ainz was evil, then why did he ask for the citizens of Re-Estize to receive a painless death? Is it the remaining reasoning of Suzuki Satoru? If so, then how come Ainz is perfectly okay with the continued torturing and experimenting on the Sunlight Scripture when all they did was what they thought was right? Where is the line drawn? Is this an example of the supposed "Ainz gets more evil as time passes because of his undead mentality/curse"?