Talk:Arche Eeb Rile Furt/@comment-75.156.119.39-20150927064330/@comment-184.164.171.142-20150929085956

Don't get us wrong. Most of the crowd who would like to see arche come back are NOT peer-pressuring the author. In fact the author would have to be really sensitive to change something just because some fans wanted it. Rather, I'd like to think of reasons why the author would bring her back, not because of pressure from fans, but for actual storyline reasons. To fulfill some purpose that helps advance or at least flesh out the story.

Even if the author did bring arche back, I doubt it would be because of fan demand. If that ever happened, at that point, anyone looking to blame the author for being peer-pressured into his decision should seriously fuck off. If he was that susceptible to fan demand he would have kept it similar to the WN rather then killing her in the first place, so even if someone suspects that there might be fan-based reasons for a revival, they would be better served giving the author the benefit of doubt...

As far as ruining the impact of volume 7... not really. Not unless someone already spoiled to you that she is going to be revived before you read volume 7... well at least not for me in any case. Not if her being revived was not random whim, but actually the author wanting to make further use of an already developed character. Also, def not in a world where revival magic has already been shown many times. Perhaps if it was not fantasy with established means of resurection it would feel more like a cop out to me if she came back...